![]() |
| Sani, Tarique. "Bay-backed shrike." Photograph. Flickr. Yahoo, 18 Nov. 2009. Web. 20 Feb. 2014 <http://www.flickr.com/photos/44124448383@N01/4391855108>. |
When I read this article I thought to my self that how was it possible that a little bird like, the one in the image, can be aggressive. I wouldn't think that little flying animals like birds would harm anybody or anything. Except for what they eat, because they eat even more little insects and creatures. I thought this article was interesting and also that people are studying bird behavior and whether their very aggressive or little aggressive depending on the situation.
How does the structure of the text refine and support the author’s claim? The author supports his claim by the structure of the text because it is short and simple. Also the author uses an example, he stated that, "It's kind of like when talk show hosts say "95 percent of 13-year old (who responded to our online survey) are smoking pot!!!" -- leaving out the part about it really being 95 percent of the particular 20 teenagers who felt like responding to our survey." He was comparing the bird study to a survey. The author also says that "the idea of animal personality is not one that's been formally studied all that much." He says this because he then goes on with a different paragraph talking about the study that is being made on birds.
Farbman, M. "Strong Personalities Skew Study Samples." popsci. Bonnier Corporation, 27 May 2009. Web. 20 Feb. 2014. <http://www.popsci.com/scitech/article/2009-05/strong-personalities-skew-study-samples?dom=PSC&loc=recent&lnk=2&con=strong-personalities-skew-study-samples>.
